I have received this interesting video and have decided to put my spin on certain statements in it.
The video is titled “The glucose expert”. It is a good take using biochemistry as the base for explanation of biology and this brings shortcomings I want to elaborate on.
Professor dr. Robert Lustig explains how the hormones act in controlling human emotions but runs short on an explanation of why people are not affected in the same way equally.
Professor Lustig explains the difference between the actions of dopamine and serotonin. Both are hormones and neurotransmitters, but with opposite action. One calms down and the other agitates the nervous system. The problem I see is in the interpretation of happiness as a state of tranquility. This is a mistake. We believe that the ultimate happiness can only be achieved in the perfect calmness.
When we join extreme happiness with the extreme stimulation we get euphoria. This is the feeling when you love someone and during the sex, experience simultaneous orgasm.
Euphoria can also be experienced by a woman giving birth to a baby when she is in love and the pain converts into the euphoric experience.
Why do not all women have euphoric experiences during childbirth?
There will always be some kind of problem when a woman’s body is dehydrated and toxic.
When the woman is dehydrated, she cannot lubricate correctly, she cannot dilate well, she is not flexible and this causes problems during childbirth.
Similar things are related to other activities of the body. For example, if you love chocolate and you are in love and have no other problems in your life, the pleasure of eating the chocolate combined with the feeling of love and well-being makes the experience of eating chocolate euphoric.
It is obvious that the dehydrated and toxic body will have different experiences because it is not resonating correctly and when we frequently repeat the stimulation, the toxicity will have more impact on the area of the body that is more active.
This is why young men can have sex three or more times a day with no ill effects, and older men, the more sexually active they are, the more they will suffer from prostate inflammation and develop erectile dysfunction.
There is nothing better than combining excitement with love. They do not work against each other. A frequent firing of a neuron does not weaken it or cause its destruction. Toxicity does.
The more pleasure you seek the more unhappy you get is not exactly the way it is. You get unhappy if you cannot get what you seek or if you are so toxic that the body starts to fail you.
I will never be tired of sailing, and it gives me more pleasure if someone I love enjoys it with me. Things change if the boat starts taking in water in the middle of the ocean.
Obviously, professor Lustig’s theories need a bit of refinement.
Now we come to the topic of “sugar”. Right here we have to pause and reframe. The brain does not respond to sugar, it responds to glucose and sweetness. Those are two different things and act on the brain in different ways.
The glucose acts on the brain’s energy manipulation and production and sweetness is a signal in the form of frequency that stimulates the brain differently.
The sensation of sweetness can come from a certain type of carbohydrate we call fructose, but it can also come from certain amino acids like in stevia.
Glucose does not stimulate dopamine production, the frequency of sweetness does. We are differently stimulated when we eat pasta and differently when we have fruit, honey, or stevia.
Professor Lustig says that glucose is the energy of life. Yes, as far as plants are concerned but for us and the animals, the energy of life is fat. Here most of his explanations disintegrate. Animal cells use glucose as fuel only in the situation of stress as a buster of an explosive energy whose source is glycogen.
The body has glucose in the blood but not to be used for energy. The only glucose that is made for the purpose of being used as cellular fuel is glycogen, and I have explained that glycogen is a buster fuel for the purpose in stress management.
The good professor claims that the brain uses glucose for energy but then he briefly mentions that it can also run on ketones. Only in the glucoholic body brain uses glucose for energy. Unfortunately, over 90% of the population are glucoholics.
Blood sugar is necessary, this is why it is there but without the poisoning with insulin, cells will not absorb it, this is why the GLUT transporter is available which cannot supply enough sugar to be used as the cellular fuel.
Now, our “Glucose expert” shows how misguided he is about fructose and glucose altogether, when he claims that fructose is toxic. I guess all hummingbirds should be poisoned to death since they consume pure fructose in the form of nectar.
Here, you can learn the truth about fructose
According to the professor, glucose is necessary and fructose is a toxic poison. I debunked this nonsense years ago, dr. Joseph Mercola was saying the same stupidity, it is circulating in soyentific circles, no wonder soyence is not improving.
I am only 15 minutes into this video which is proving to be a bunch of misconceptions and incorrect statements. He also slipped in that climate change is true, and that the soyence is based on data collected through statistics. He said that sugar causes small vessels to constrict. In fact, insulin causes constriction, and constricted small vessels will block the passage of blood while big blood vessels will become rigid which is the cause of an increased blood pressure. A bit different from what the professor is saying.
I could not continue watching this nonsense further because all statements were wrong. Especially about the mitochondria and that they are working better on glucose and that glucose helps to activate more mitochondria, it is pure bull***. A soyence on steroids.
Often my friends urge me to talk to those video makers to be interviewed by them. I am all for it but with the exception of Patrick Timpone and a couple of others, everyone else who was made aware of my work and contacted me for an interview has backed out. Some of the interviews were scheduled to be with other participants on the same topic and they backed out so the show was cancelled.
I will debate anyone because the truth wins in the end. Soyence has no chance when science is exposed. It all falls apart like the House of Cards.
My friends and family, you are sitting in the first row of seats watching the destruction of the soyence of madsin unfolding right in front of your eyes.
Love and light to us all.