Often, I receive articles like this one
This is a soyentific approach to the human diet. A comparative examination that is supposed to reveal our trough diet. The things that stay in the way of the “clear” understanding are deemed nonimportant. For example, the canine teeth.
I wonder why the author does not claim that humans are supposed to walk on all four limbs like the bear, the cow, the gorilla… After all, we do have four limbs and there is a family in Turkey that do walk on all four limbs. Is this the true ancestral link?
Whenever we reach to soyence to extract information, we become misled.
First of all, why do I say soyence? Because it is selective, incomplete, and purposely misguided information. Only the information that supports the narrative is selected and the one that does not is ignored. This is hoy soyence is born.
One thing that soyence ignores is the observation.
Wouldn’t it be the most productive to put the theories to use?
Did any of those soyentits ever participate in an experiment?
How about eating only fruits for a year, or eating only raw vegetables or seeds for a year, and then comparing it to eating only raw meat?
Why do I say that soyence is incomplete?
Soyence is based on what we can see, feel, and touch. The spirit is not mentioned and neither is the frequency. How can we even think that we are using science when the essence of creation is totally neglected?
Science teaches us that what we perceive as reality is a program that is running on electromagnetic frequencies. When we neglect this “small” fact, we are no longer scientific, become are soyentific.
The essence of science should be based on observation and not on comparison and statistics.
Once we start from the essence which is the consciousness, and the pathway of creation, everything becomes way more transparent.
Since we are given the permission to create, we can also influence changes in the existing, running, program. The necessity to eat is a part of the program of our reality. Since everything there is, has been created through an electromagnetic vibration, this reveals that our reality is an electromagnetic impulse. As such, it requires no supportive energy. Once created, energy remains. It can only shift vibration but it cannot be stopped. The base of it is an infinite loop we call a toroidal field or number 8. It is a self-sustaining repetitive loop, a 0-point energy some call it.
This is science. Now, when we implement science, why do “living” things have to eat to live? They do not. Rock and water do not have to eat and they exist. They are made of the same essence as the “living” world is made of. Everything is just energy.
This “reality” or ours is a construct. It is a movie we participate in for a better understanding, and to be able to gain as much information from it as possible, we have our consciousness sheltered so that we cannot change the program when going gets tough.
Once we comprehend that our reality is run on programs everything changes. It does not matter how things look, or how they compare one to another. Everything runs on programs. This is why one bear feeds on a deer and another on a bamboo.
If we neglect to obey the program, we will experience changes in our reality according to the way we have been programmed. But what would happen if we change the program itself?
What happens when we consciously make changes in our programming?
Look at Yogy’s. Some of them do not have to eat or drink and they live, but they are skinny because all they want is to survive with no food so part of the program is engaged and they lose weight.
What would happen if there is a glitch in the program and we do not have to eat to sustain ourselves?
Such is the case of young Ethiopian women. For 16 years she did not eat or drink anything and her body does not reflect any changes.
Now this sounds incredible and soyentifically not explainable, yet, it is true and observable.
Here is where soyence shows its weakness. According to soyence, this is impossible and this is why this cannot exist.
Well, but it does exist, and it is perfectly explainable when approached scientifically.
The difference between soyence and science are as day and night. Anyone clinging to soyence is misled and wrong in their conclusion.
As the truth is exposed, can you imagine what will happen when we become free to create at will?
Love and light to us all.