The COVID situation has exposed the fraudulent medical and pharmaceutical systems.
Because the vast number of people who have suffered so that the rest can be awakened is presenting a question.
If we punish everyone that was involved in this plandemic, and if we add to the pile every death that was caused by the false indoctrination and punish the responsible for their death, a great majority (90% if not more) of the medical staff that was involved in treating and supporting those people during their days of need, would end up in jail.
Even if we pardon most of them because of their ignorance and if we just punish those who have received bribes and knowingly committed crimes on humanity, we are going to be extremely short on the medical staff.
Can people survive without personal medical attention?
Of course, they can, and they will be healthier for it.
If you are new to this site, you may wonder what am I talking about?
How can sick people benefit from a shortage of professional medical staff?
Through my work, I have proven that doctors are educated in how to poison people without their patients being aware of it. The system is so well-orchestrated that even the executioners/doctors are not aware of the impact their work has on their patients, and that those treatments go only in one direction which is the cemetery.
I have chosen videos of two health experts to show you how they come to the correct conclusion based on statistics, and they manufacture nonsensical medical truths to be able to support the science behind it.
At least, they are trying to understand what is going on because they did not receive the correct knowledge in medical school, and what they have been told does not cut the mustard.
Both videos are about sugar, carbohydrates, fats, and obesity.
First is the video of Dr. Sten Ekberg https://www.youtube.com/embed/XS_kjTAnpP0?version=3&rel=1&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&fs=1&hl=en&autohide=2&wmode=transparent
Dr. Ekberg states that sugar, the sweet stuff is fructose with other types of carbohydrates, mostly glucose. He calls it the sweet stuff.
It is pretty much ok what he says about the glucose, but what he says about fructose is a complete bull.
Glucose and fructose are converted into fat by the liver. The only difference is that glucose can be used as cellular fuel, and fructose cannot.
Fructose does not increase insulin production because cells will not use it so there is no point in forcing fructose into the cells, overall blood sugar rises and insulin becomes released because there already is glucose in the blood so some of it will be utilized by cells.
No matter how much fructose we consume, if we do not consume dietary glucose, the sugar absorption would remain low and no blood sugar would spike. This is not something that Dr. Ekberg understands.
Dr. Ekberg claims that sweet sugar is what causes us harm, the glucose without fructose is starch and equally harmful. This is the truth but the body has no problem using its correct energy source, the fat but the number of mitochondria is not sufficient for creating enough energy in glucoholic cells.
I explain that fructose triggers a hunger craze which Dr. Ekberg is also realizing but the indoctrinated information that the brain requires glucose to be able to have enough energy is false. Again, the mitochondria count is not taken into consideration.
There is a ridiculous idea that we are all wired differently has to be debunked. We program ourselves through the food we eat and genes are doing the reprogramming/adjustment to the environment we are creating in our body.
Insulin does not lock down fat. That is nonsense. There is no need for insulin when we do not pollute our blood with dietary glucose.
Triglycerides do not drop when you eat less sugar because they are made from sugar as Dr. Ekberg claims, they drop because the cells are producing more energy by utilizing fat as more mitochondria are being activated when you do not eat dietary glucose so the lower amount of triglycerides will be able to correctly energize the cells.
Going to video number two where Robert H. Lustig, MD, UCSF Professor of Pediatrics in the Division of Endocrinology, explores the damage caused by sugary foods. https://www.youtube.com/embed/dBnniua6-oM?version=3&rel=1&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&fs=1&hl=en&autohide=2&wmode=transparent
Here Dr. professor Lustig is blaming fructose ignoring the fact that no matter how much fructose you eat, you will not increase sugar absorption and you will never become harmed by elevated blood sugar.
Glucose/starch/carbohydrate increases sugar absorption which enables more fructose to be absorbed but in no way fructose is more harmful than glucose.
High fructose corn syrup and table sugar are equally problematic. They are both roughly 40% fructose and 60% glucose.
Another total misunderstanding of cholesterol that deserves the lowes score!!!
All cholesterol is dispersed fat highly buoyant and in a correctly energized body, it is positively charged and it is repelled from the wall of blood vessels.
The presence of cholesterol in the blood, no matter how much of it there is has absolutely no influence on blood circulation whatsoever.
Vegetable fiber is absolutely unnecessary so whatever professor is saying about fiber is totally unimportant.
He is correct. Fructose does not suppress hunger, it actually intensifies it because it instigates cellular metabolism and cannot be used to produce energy so the liver has to convert it into fat, but all glucose that we eat is also converted into fat. The difference is that a small amount of glucose will be shoved into the cells and used for energy production which will suppress hunger.
Because professor Lustig does not understand what damage dietary glucose creates, he accepts the scientific explanation of the evil of fructose, the only healthy sweetener if we do not have contact with the Biblical forbidden food, glucose.
He blames fructose for the metabolic syndrome, a total miss.
Another false statement is that “glucose is the energy of all life”.
Glucose is the energy of plants and a buster fuel for animals. Fat is energy for animals.
All of the chemical information is correct with the exception that the fact that glucose increases the sugar absorption and this is what enables a higher amount of fructose to be absorbed, is either being ignored, or the professor is not aware of this fact. This information is the game changer and destroys all other theories about the evil of fructose.
Another misunderstanding is that there is an infinite amount of glycogen stored in the liver.
Our dear professor has to go back to school but not the one he is representing.
We have to take down the entire scientific forum and liberate the science from opportunistic sleazebags whose only goal is to financially benefit from it.
I am not attacking any of the doctors mentioned in this article. I admire them for trying to solve the puzzle the fake science has created and I am just pointing that this is impossible no matter how much we try if we do not step out of the box, and approach the problem with an open mind, not bound to the science we are being fed with.
I can go on and on debunking many other claims but the article is already too long.
Bit by bit, we will bring truth into the open.
We do not need doctors with this kind of knowledge so the less of them we have, the better we are off.
Love and light to us all.