Carcinogens are being mentioned on many products, even some food products.
They are added to vaccines, and openly discussed by doctors of both the allopathic and the alternative medicine, and the information is not being censored. Isn’t that strange?
The carcinogen substances are even mentioned on the fake News Networks. How is this allowed?
Isn’t this revealing the truth and causing a revolt?
Obviously not, and pointing to those things is actually playing into the hands of the evil agenda.
We can only manifest what the brain knows so the more toxic information it has, the better chance it is that the desired “reality” will be manifested.
In the past, when people were suffering from some “incurable disease”, doctors would talk to their families and suggest not to tell the patient the truth.
If they would know the truth, fear would have set in causing the nocebo effect making them sicker, and cause them to deteriorate faster.
Today, under the pretense of the “right to know the truth”, people are informed of the worst possibilities that can happen as soon as they sneeze.
A slightly inflamed lymph node and you are being told that there is a possibility of cancer and a biopsy should be done.
The power of manifestation is implemented but not for the good, just the opposite.
To set the fear so that an agenda can be implemented, the media, movies, and “science” are being used, and always only the bad things are flooding the information outlets.
I am tired of talking about a nonexistent virus. Not just the Wu-flu, but every disease that is blamed to be caused by a virus is simply just a toxic release, but our scientists and doctors are so brainwashed that it is very difficult for them to see the truth even when it is poking them in the eye.
Here is another example of a doctor giving a scientific opinion on cancer.
No wonder, scientifically, we are getting further and further away from the truth.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rewf0MMhGg8In this video, Dr. Eric Berg is pointing to a mitochondrial error which is probably the cause why the cell had turned cancerous.
On top of this, he points to amino acid glutamine blaming it as being another source of energy for an anaerobic cancer cell.
This is a typical parrot talk. Just repeating what he was told, no thinking, no doubt, although the information he provides has as many holes as Swiss cheese, and some things simply are obviously wrong.
Let’s apply critical thinking.
Dr. Berg states that the mitochondria are damaged from, radiation, chemicals, “stress”…implying that the damaged mitochondria cannot produce energy correctly.
Isn’t this just plain stupid since the mitochondria are not damaged to produce energy from the glucose or the amino acid?
The Krebs Cycle that converts the glucose into energy also converts fat into glucose and glucose into the fat.
If the reaction can go on in one direction, it can also go on in the other directions so the claim of damaged mitochondria is obviously false, but who’s thinking?
The amino acid glutamine has in its formula a carboxyl group(-COOH).
This carboxyl group is the reason why we have sugar in the blood. Every amino acid’s carboxyl group is made by it.
This carboxyl group provides the Krebs reaction with the necessary carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen to produce energy, or fat, or sugar, and carbon dioxide. And because it contains oxygen, the energy can be made without the additional oxygen being supplied/anaerobically.
What is being neglected is the fact that every amino acid has a carboxyl group and can be used the same way.
This is just another “look over here and not over there” case as it is with the fructose and the glucose situation of a false claim that fructose causes an increase of uric acid and the glucose is praised for its health benefits.
All lies and misguided and manipulated “scientific” facts.
The science of biochemistry can be so easily pointed in the wrong direction, this is why the entire medical science is based on it.
Yes, cancer can be energized by amino acids if they would have been in the blood, but they are not.
The amino acid we absorb through the intestine is going to be processed in the intestinal reactor into what is demanded by our cells.
So they will be used to produce protein for cholesterol as the cellular building material, and what is left over will be converted into fat, bonded to glycerol into triglyceride, and secreted into the blood.
Many unwanted elements will be then cleansed directly back into the intestines as unwanted garbage.
There may be an increase of amino acids in the blood but not caused by what we have eaten, but by decomposition of dead cells of tissue in the case of cachexia, (body feeding on its own tissue).
As you can see, partial knowledge and no thinking are way more dangerous than not knowing at all.
The nagalase and the lack of GcMAF immune marker are no being mentioned at all, and neither is mentioned the real cause of the uncontrolled proliferation of cells which we call cancer and that is the low cellular voltage.
The reason why the mitochondria are being blamed is the fact that most of the mitochondria in the cancer cell are inactive, not damaged.
I have explained that the glucoholic cell, being a normal cell of people who eat carbohydrates or a cancer cell, will deactivate many mitochondria not to produce too much energy when the glucose is provided as the energy source.
Since cancer cells use glucose for energy production, they deactivate most of their mitochondria. This means that the mitochondria are not damaged, it does the work it is supposed to do and does it well, there are just very few mitochondria that are doing the job, that’s all.
The inactive mitochondria are on a stand-by, waiting to be activated as soon as the fuel changes.
Change your diet, help your body to cleanse, and in the case of cancer, control your emotions, and you will heal.
Love and light to us all